The basic nature of leadership.

August 12th, 2011

“To become a leader, you must first become a human being.” – Confucius

Wisdom about leadership that spans millenia coincided for me this week. And it was the common thread of humanness in each reference that struck me as critically central to the development and cultivation of real leaders.

Confucius spoke the above quote above twenty-five hundred years ago. I read it in the revised and updated edition of Peter M. Senge’s “The Fifth Discipline,” cited in my July 22nd blog post. It’s the first sentence of the text subtitled, “What do we mean by ‘Leaders?’” and a portion of the section that, according to Senge, was the most widely read of the original “Fifth Discipline.”

Then I happened upon two blog entries that linked to this ancient Confucian wisdom beyond Senge’s influential work.

First up is Eblin Group co-founder and author Scott Eblin who was with about 20,000 other people on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol in June when the Dalai Lama came out to talk about world peace. He relates the experience in his “Next Level Blog” entry and says that “the Dalai Lama’s approach to leadership and peace puts an emphasis on individual action and relationship building.” Eblin shares a few “highly paraphrased” ideas of what the Dalai Lama shared:

  • The biggest mistake people make is looking externally for happiness. Happiness starts with a calm and peaceful mind.
  • Too much formality creates barriers to communicating on a person-to-person basis. We should practice heart to heart interaction instead.
  • Warm heartedness leads to self-confidence. Humans are social animals. We need to interact. Self-centeredness is counter to true human nature.

I found those ideas central to a recent article by David Witt of the Ken Blanchard Companies, titled “Do you really care about your people?”  Witt writes that leaders sometimes get caught up in the “false dilemma” of feeling like they have to choose between focusing on people and focusing on performance. As Blanchard has advised for decades, Witt reminds us that the best leaders focus simultaneously on both people and results.

Witt presents the acronym CARE to help leaders at all levels remember to take the time to show their humanness for the people with whom they work and the people who report to them. These are Witt’s words:

Connect. Take the time to lift your nose from the grindstone today and check in with your people. How’s it going? What’s happening in their life? What are they excited about? You might be surprised at how long it’s been since you checked in, or how much has changed in their lives. Take a minute to reconnect.

Acknowledge. Listen to what people are telling you. Truly hear what they are saying.  As a leader, it’s easy to get caught up in telling instead of listening. How are your people doing on their tasks and key responsibility areas? Chances are that they are just as busy as you are. Take a minute to acknowledge the work they are doing and the effort they are putting into it.

Respect—the skills, effort, challenges, and needs that your people have. What are their strengths? What challenges are they facing? Where do they need help? What can you do to help them succeed? Don’t fall into the trap of thinking that your primary job is to evaluate performance. As a leader, your primary job is to help your people succeed.

Encourage. Everyone can use a kind word, a pat on the back, and a word of encouragement. Who in your group has been up against it, fighting fires, chasing deadlines, and making sure that things get done? Who seems burnt, or worn out, from all the work they’ve had to accomplish? Take a minute to show your appreciation, offer some encouragement, and let them know that you appreciate what they’ve been doing.

So I’ve been pondering these timeless ideas. And I believe indeed that our interactions with others must begin with our humanness. It takes heart and mind communication with people to bring out the qualities that lead to their best performance.

I hope you take the lead.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Great Balancing Act.

August 5th, 2011

Will you succeed?
Yes! You will indeed!
(98 and ¾ percent guaranteed.)

Who didn’t grow up having a favorite Dr. Seuss book? Mine was “The Cat in the Hat.” I was in awe of that mischievous cat who caused a big pink household mess for two kids while their mother was away, only to clean it up just in time. I take great pleasure in giving Dr. Seuss books as gifts for children, but had never bought one only for myself until last week when I purchased “Oh, the Places You’ll Go.”

I first read this modern classic as an adult. It lay out as a coffee-table book at my father’s house. The wisdom this amazing doctor of verse wrote as a graduation speech at age 87 had come at a time I needed to hear it. I had been “waiting” for something to happen in my life.

Earlier this year, I was reminded of the power and energy behind this poem while reading Suitcase Entrepreneur Natalie Sisson’s blog about having been in the same place – in need of some “un-slumping” – when a friend presented her with a copy of the book.

Natalie hit on all the points:

“I was waiting for someone to make the decision for me. For a yes or no to make my decision for me. Even worse I was leaving my life up to the hands of fate – or other people!

“Well life doesn’t work like that. It’s up to you to take yourself where you want to go. And when you develop that clear road map of exactly what you want out of life, how your business will flourish, your health will skyrocket, your bank account will blossom and ……

Oh the places you shall go when you do!”

Dr Seuss gives such wise advice:

Congratulations!
Today is your day.
You’re off to Great Places!
You’re off and away!

You have brains in your head.
You have feet in your shoes.
You can steer yourself any direction you choose.
You’re on your own. And you know what you know. And YOU are the guy who’ll decide where to go.

You’ll look up and down streets. Look ’em over with care. About some you will say, “I don’t choose to go there.” With your head full of brains and your shoes full of feet, you’re too smart to go down a not-so-good street.

And you may not find any you’ll want to go down. In that case, of course, you’ll head straight out of town. It’s opener there in the wide open air.

Out there things can happen and frequently do to people as brainy and footsy as you.

And when things start to happen, don’t worry. Don’t stew. Just go right along. You’ll start happening too.

Oh! The Places You’ll Go!

You’ll be on your way up!
You’ll be seeing great sights!
You’ll join the high fliers who soar to high heights.

“Make sure to read the rest of the poem as it gets very interesting. What I love most about this poem is that he points out you’ll have times when you’re lonely. When you are in fact scared about walking down the road you’ve chosen. When you want to turn back, but you’ll go on regardless.

“That’s life, that’s all part of its rich tapestry. You’re not alone, other people are walking their own road right beside you. They too have these fears – Am I good enough? Will I succeed? Am I making a huge mistake? Can I do this?”

But here’s why you carry on:

You are off to great places.
Today is your day
Your mountain is waiting
So get on your way!

I hope today you start living the life you want. Oh, the places you surely will go. And how good you will feel!

 

Mental energy uncorked.

July 29th, 2011

The “New York boys” were a group of young men from New York City who would drive 240 miles to Elmira, NY every Tuesday to attend Jane Roberts’ ESP class in the 1970’s. Author Richard Kendall was one of them, and in his new book, “The Road to Elmira” ( 2011), writes of his experiences as a member student and reflects on teachings that ranged from the energy of consciousness to the nature of reality.

Many of the ideas in this captivating account serve as lessons themselves. In what I found to be one of the most insightful passages, Rich talks about the nature of personal energy.

He affirms that our mental energy cannot be restrained. When it flows, we’re surging with all systems on go. But if we hold back our energy or try to keep it in check, don’t worry. It will eventually find its way out. Energy that’s been “bottled up” or ignored for too long will make its way to the surface eventually and find expression in a manner you would, no doubt, want to describe as either undesirable or uncharacteristic.

Any impediment to our creativity, our spontaneity, our well-being or — while we’re at it — our   success “doesn’t come about from the release of our energy, but from our attempts to stifle it.”

The lesson here was a welcome reminder to ideas I’ve shared before. If you ever feel stuck (and who doesn’t now and then?) or find yourself in “mental gridlock,” unable to think about problems or challenges in new ways, remember the tremendous force and power or your own energy. Uncork it. Let it loose. It wants the same freedom you do. Trust it to open mental pathways to new thinking. Its potential is always there. You are truly the leader of you.

 

 

The Ladder of Inference.

July 22nd, 2011

Whatever your position on the organizational or corporate ladder, your success may very well depend on your use of the “ladder of inference.”

Chris Argyris, American business theorist and Professor Emeritus at Harvard Business School, designed the ladder of inference as a tool of “action science,” a field of inquiry he developed with MIT professor Donald Schon, which explored the reasoning and attitudes underlying human action for the purpose of  producing more effective learning in organizations.

I learned of their work decades ago, while reading about the discipline of managing “mental models” in Peter M. Senge’s seminal business book, “The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization” (1990, revised edition 2006) and his subsequent publication “The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization” (1994). A discussion I had this week about beliefs and their capacity to shape our experience, prompted me to open those books yesterday. Here’s what I think is important enough to share with you.

Mental models – our beliefs, our assumptions, and our deeply held internal pictures of how the world works – affect what we see and shape how we act. They are generally unexamined and invisible to all of us, until we look for them. But they are always active and therefore often limit us to familiar ways of thinking and acting. According to Senge, “Two people with different mental models can observe the same event and describe it differently, because they’ve looked at different details and made different interpretations.” Think of the difference in several observers’ reports of the same car accident.

We can, however, manage our mental models and improve our communications by developing two types of skills: reflection (slowing down our thinking processes to be come more aware of how we form our beliefs) and inquiry (holding conversations where we openly share views and develop knowledge about each others’ assumptions.)

As one of the “Fieldbook” co-authors, Rick Ross, explains: We live in a world of self-generating beliefs which remain largely untested. We adopt those beliefs because they are based on conclusions, which are inferred from what we observe, plus our past experience. Our ability to achieve the results we truly desire is eroded by our feelings that:

  • Our beliefs are the truth.
  • The truth is obvious.
  • Our beliefs are based on real data.
  • The data we select are the real data.

The ladder of inference then is one of the tools designed to build the skills of reflection and inquiry. It’s a brilliant metaphor for showing how quickly we can leap knee-jerk conclusions with little data and no intermediate thought process. It looks like this:

 

I’ll illustrates with one of Ross’ examples: I’m making a presentation before the executive team. Everyone seems engaged except Larry, who appears bored out of his mind. He turns away from me and puts his hand to his mouth. He doesn’t ask any questions, but when I’m almost done breaks in to suggest that a full report be requested. Everyone starts to put away their notes. I think it’s obvious Larry thinks I’m incompetent. I think Larry has never liked my ideas and that, clearly, he’s a power-hungry jerk working against me. By the time I’m back in my seat I’ve decided I’m not going to use anything in my report that Larry can use.

  • I started at the bottom of the ladder with observable data: Larry’s comment which is so self-evident that it would show up on a video recorder…
  • …I select some detail about Larry’s behavior: his glance away from me and apparent yawn. (I didn’t notice him listening intently one moment before)…
  • …I added some meanings of my own, based on the culture around me (that Larry wanted me to finish up)…
  • …I moved rapidly up to assumptions about Larry’s current state (he’s bored)…
  • …and I concluded that Larry, in general, thinks I’m incompetent. In fact, I now believe that Larry (and probably everyone whom I associate with Larry) is dangerously opposed to me…
  • …thus, as I reach the top of the ladder, I don’t trust Larry and am plotting against him.

As for the “reflexive loop,” the more I believe Larry is against me, the more I will find evidence in his future behavior to reinforce that belief.

While it’s our nature to draw conclusions, we can improve our  communications by using the ladder of inference in three ways:

  • Becoming more aware of our own thinking and reasoning (reflection);
  • Making our thinking and reasoning more visible to others (advocacy);
  • Inquiring into others’ thinking and reasoning (inquiry.)

So if Larry and I understand the concepts behind the ladder of inference, we can have a safe, non-threatening conversation to share our thinking processes and ask questions about each others’ reasoning. I can ask him directly what his reaction is to the presentation. I can test my assumption that he’s bored, or I can just test the observable data that he was quiet. To which he might have replied, “Yeah, I’m taking notes; I love this stuff.”

I assure you, we do have the ability to create an attitude we do not have currently. Our point of power is always right now, in the present moment. And the tools exist to help us re-shape our beliefs, have more enjoyably collaborative work experiences and move our organizations forward.

 

Making sense of perception.

July 15th, 2011

It’s no secret that the nature of consciousness remains one of the great scientific mysteries of our time. And a fascinating report on the pioneering work of some internationally renown scientists on inner-sense data covered in a recent Science Channel episode of “Through the Wormhole,” titled “Is there a Sixth Sense?” pushes the boundaries on what our minds are capable of with new scientific evidence. YouTube has conveniently divided the 30-minute segment into Part 1 and Part 2.

It’s viewing that I think might lead you to some provocative discussion this weekend. At the least, it will stimulate some exciting thoughts. Here’s a sampling of the research presented about that vast network in our heads:

·      Beatrice de Gelder, professor of neuropsychology at Tilburg University in The Netherlands and senior scientist at the Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, has shown that our brains can sense things even when we’re not aware of them. In a study of stroke victims left blind in one eye, she has identified subconscious mental pathways we all have that allow us not to see emotional stimuli, but to sense them.

·      Roger D. Nelson, director of the Global Consciousness Project (GCP) and former coordinator of research at the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) lab at Princeton University, has produced evidence in a 30-year study that shows consciousness exists not only in our minds, but extends outward as well.

·      British biologist Rupert Sheldrake has collected a body of evidence to support the idea that our minds work through extended “morphic” fields that link us to other people and our environment.

·      Michael Persinger, who runs the Neuroscience Research Group at Laurentian University in Ontario, demonstrates his evidence that thoughts – as “physical units of action potentials from the nerve” – can be transmitted across space.

In the field of Qinomics, the continuing study of links between conscious awareness and subconscious experience – the energy of our minds – and scientific evidence of the abilities of an inner sense or, more likely, inner senses, will always be welcome knowledge. What do you think? Or, as I more frequently like to ask: what are you thinking about?